Place an order for a custom essay, research paper on this or related subject.
The failure of the heart to pump results to reduction in blood supply to heart muscles and body tissues. it results from fibrillation which distorts the normal pumping action of the heart. Inadequate refilling of the heart compromises oxygenation of the myocardium leading to depreciation in the quality of contractility. Rapid and specific action is required for survival o the patient.
Myocardial infraction ranks as the most common predecessor of CS. Cardiogenic Shock magnifies the mortality rate of of patients with acute myocardial infraction. Despite possibility of bedside anticipation of CS, more advanced confirmation is required for diagnosis. hypo-tension and myocardial dysfunction characterized by reduction in urine form a basis fro positive diagnosis.
Autopsy reports depict that loss of more than 40% of the LV muscles is attributed to Cs thus CS is common with situations of anterior as opposed to inferior infractions. Acute ischemia is attributed to mechanical ramifications in the spheres of mitral regurgitations,rupturing of the ventricular septum or wall.
CS can result from myopathic (severe myocardial infraction or depression as well as myocarditis) or mechanical shock(acute regurgitation of the miter or ventricular malfunction including rupturing of the myocardium). Severe metabolic disequilibrium in oxygen levels and acute valvular regurgitation resulting from sepsis results to adequate dysfunction resulting to shock.
Inadequate intra-vascular levels resulting from near-anoxia in the cardiac muscles leads to decreased systolic blood pressure of below 90 mm Hg. This reduction in pressure coupled with reduce impoverished cardiac index(medically calibrated at below2.2 L/min/m2 )is the breeding criteria for Cardiogenic Shock. The cardiac dysfunction originates from violation of myocardial functions resulting to restriction of blood supply. The situation develops to a downward spiral since marginal myocytes at the border are more prone to subsequent ischemia.
Cardiogenic Shock patients who have ischemia occurring from outback areas e.g. the brain, face a risk of experiencing magnified systolic dysfunctions. Inefficiencies occurring at valves increase congestion in the pulmonary segment as well as increasing pressure in the left atrium. With lessened after-load diminution,complete rupturing of the cardiac muscles will result in an individual experiencing pulmonary puffiness (Cruden 2002) or Cardiogenic Shock (Hochman et al 2006).
Hypoxia resulting from the ischemia results to anaerobic glycolysis coupled with depletion adenosine triphosphate(ADT). The resultant accumulation of lactic acid according to Sartori, C. et al.(2003) impairs the transfer of ions whose transfer is solely dependent on presence of energy. Permanent damage follows over-accumulation of toxic calcium compounds which denatures necessary proteins as well causing lysosolalysis as discovered by Pfisterer (2003).
Clinical manifestation of Cardiogenic Shock can be mapped out as either as history or physical signs and symptoms. Normally Cardiogenic Shock succeeds acute ischaemia after admission to hospital or may solely obviate itself . Low cardiac output is evident from acute sweating coupled with low urine volume. Later appearance of systemic hypo-tension occurs with delayed development.
However instances of individuals developing acute myocardial infraction are preceded by crushing chest pain which may reverberate to the left are or jaw due to innervation. Senescence and diabetes may blanket the pain whose characteristics vary from sharp to burning. Reserved nausea and vomiting may occur in some patients who may also experience sustained sweating.
Cyanosis and cold skin at the extremities are resultants factors of vitiated circulatory system. Rapid weakening pulse follows with massive jugular vein dilatation. Then weakening pulse graduates to irregular pulse with fibrillation following suit coupled with tachycardia. Though mostly limited to early systole, murmuring of mitral back-flow which becomes magnifies as the infraction becomes sub-aortic.
According to the the national heart lung and blood institute,those who have experienced a heart attack and are hypertensive (Geller,2004)stand a higher risk of recurrent myocardial infraction. The risk level is magnified by age or coronary conditions in the major blood vessels.
Cardiogenic patients can either be conscious or in a coma. Responsive casualties can give description of the recognition features. Similarly, monitoring the Airway,Breathing and Circulation (ABC) minimizes risk of hypoxia. By collaborating signs, symptoms, history and external clues one is able to diagnose CS.
Recognition features including disorders of the ABC life are life threatening. Rapid reaction by placing the patient in a comfortable position is necessary. By checking the skin color for cyanosis and warmth, one will be able to collaborate the history and know if the casualty is experiencing AMI. Positive diagnosis calls for 100% oxygen administration and tablet of aspirin(in non-allergic casualties). After loading up the patient into the ambulance, the next step is to frequently monitor and record the breathing and circulation.
Casualties with previous instances of cardiac disorders may have medication (vasopressors or vaso-dilators) and administer the correct dosage. Any changes in the breathing and circulatory rate should be noted.
In case the casualty stops goes into fibrillation,the immediate step is to commence CPR. Locate the heart between the breasts and press 30 times to achieve adequate perfusion of blood. Since breathing will also be absent, effective rescue breaths to supply vital oxygen to the lungs is necessary. By combining 30 chest compressions and 2 effective rescue breaths for a minute, one will be able to normalize blood supply to the brain.
After resuscitating for a minute, by use of automated external defibrillator(AED) one should administer shock to the casualty for up to 10 times(adults only) by which time the ambulance shall have arrived at the clinical center for more specialized medication and procedures. AEDs have inbuilt voice outputs giving instructions one what to do at any point in time. Safety precautions have to be observed during the procedure to avoid electric shock injury to the EMT.
As outlined earlier, there are numerous forms of shock which can occur. The most common include massive allergic reactions leading elevated toxic levels, overdose related shock in addition to Cardiogenic Shock.
Factor leading to development of shock are key to mapping treatment and preventive therapy. Donahue et al (2004)related genetic factors to occurrence of Acute Myocardial Infraction(AMI) due to genetic influence in chemical composition of the body. History of Cardiogenic Shock (CS) in the family background was attributed to graduation of AMI to Cardiogenic Shock or elevated mortality rates.
Daeurman et al (2001) reported that there was higher mortality rates in patients above 65 years. Rapid response was however observed to precipitate mortality rates as well as survival after discharge. Aged males were found to be more prone although females had higher mortality rates in case of MI attacks as observed by Dzarik et al(2002).
Previous consumption of cocaine or heart surgery may underlie the situation with hypertension and cigarette smoking fostering development of ischaemia. Other inherent risk factors include history of dyslipidemia Thomson (2004) or athletes’ heart(Mann 2005). Other related recognition features include history of diaphoresis fainting muscle palpitation, elevated anxiety and depression which indicate impaired heart function.
Shock results from varied factors including angina (Chaitman 2004) septicemia, anaphylaxis and cardiac malfunction. Determination of peripheral signs are key to determining which type of shock it is. Myocardial factors coupled with the efficiency of valves and heart structure are preceding events (Hasdal 2002). The in-hospital development of Cardiogenic Shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. The incidence, outcome and predictors of the in-hospital development of Cardiogenic Shock and its prognostic significance were analyzed in 845 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.
Cardiogenic Shock developed after hospitalization in 60 patients (7.1%). In half of these patients, Cardiogenic Shock developed at least 24 hour after hospital admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was greater than 15 times higher for patients with Cardiogenic Shock than for patients without shock (65.0% versus 4.3%, respectively, p less than 0.001). Enzymatic evidence of infarction.
Hasdai (2005) reported that autonomous prognosticators for hospital occurrence of ischaemia include age over 65 years inadequate discharge by the left ventricle (less than 35%). Evident from their study was the close relationship between ventricular functions and severity of Cardiogenic Shock .
The aetiology of Cardiogenic Shock include advancement in age although it may happen at any age, gender, hyperlipidity, high blood pressure (Turner,2000), cigarette smoking,blood sugar levels, congenital factors as well as obesity (Wakai 2007). Patients who have had heart surgery are also at increased risk of developing shock.
Cardiogenic Shock occurs from inadequacy in tissue perfusion in the heart leading to a ill-functioning of the cardiac muscles. The impaired refilling at the mitral valve level increases pressure in the left half of the heart which if not relieved culminates to pulmonary hypertension unmatched with the pressure resulting from the left atrial obstruction according to Hasdai, et al (2002). Due to the observed fatality, it continues to puzzle clinicians. It occurrence calls for speedy and well-coordinated reaction failure to which it can lead to loss of life.
Clinical prevision includes amplification in the cardiac enzymes and lactate in the presence of increases heart rate. he overall incidence of Cardiogenic Shock is higher in men compared to women because of the increased prevalence of coronary artery disease in males(Cohen 2007). Through use on modern multi-step treatment including angiography (Alter, et al2004),it is possible to reduce the fatality of CS resulting from AMI starting at the emergency rescue segment according to Bohan (2008).
Patient reduces damage to myocardium and prevents development of hock on many casualties. The report by Hasdai (2000) fosters recognition of factors precipitating development of shock before graduation to haemodynamic imbalance as well as early transfer for angioplasty in scenarios of thrombolytic disorders.
Resuscitation measures to limit organ injury defines success for the treatment. Administration of inotropic therapy depending on hypo-tension degree magnitude and intra-aortic. The use of revascularisation has been reported to result to more beneficial outcomes. In spite of this finding by Dauerman (2002) the haemodynamic conditions of the patients may jeopardize success catheterisation and revascularisation.
Quick institution of of percutaneous coronary intervention are necessary for the patients arriving in the hospital (Koerner,2008). Transfer protocols in the clinical setting should provide for direct conveyance of patients experiencing AMI to centers equipped to administer cardiac catheterisation (Maier 2003).Due to presence of multiple occlusions,patients require arterial bypass surgery to improve survival chances. Funarow (2004) in his report postulated that despite advancement in intervention methods AMI and Cs contribute to post-discharge mortality. So long as it tolerated, sustained use of Beta Blockers is key to survival of patients (Ferrari et al.2008).
Emergency response units require information on the level of the alert. The LAS has established a three level alert system with category one calls (including CS) receiving top priority. The emergency medical technicians are instructed on recognition features of fatal conditions.
Of necessity is maintenance of patients vital signs ABC . Due to pulmonary edema,breathing is fast and labored compromising the patients oxygen intake. Thus ambulance crew should administer high flow oxygen at 100% to compensate for the hypoxic conditions in the body tissues. Maintenance of a clear airway, breathing and circulation is the basis of treatment.
Monitoring vitals enables the EMT to accord the right medication on the way to hospital. vitals, Through invasive and non invasive(oximetry) methods the level of oxygen can be estimated so as to prevent diagnosis resulting from clinical cyanosis. In case of use of mechanical ventilation,they help to mark weaning period after adequacy is achieved. Beta and calcium blockers are some of the available non-surgical treatment methods for arrhythmia. In addition to protecting the brain from shock,anticoagulants assist in circulation in situations of a weak heart.
In a hospital setting, insertion of Internal Cardioverter defibrillator(ICD)is used to speed up the pulse. Surgically, angioplasty is performed where balloons are inflated in the affected blood vessels to to clear them. Patients require urgent drug related interventions including aspirins and anti-emetics. Pain risks magnify risk of infraction due to presence of catecholamines occurring due to sympathetic nervous component..
With re-perfusion of occluded arteries within 30 minutes of the onset reduces instances of damage to myocardium as observed by Morrison (2000). despite major steps in reducing mortality rates , more emphasis lies on the early administration of thrombolytics.
Most patients who survive end up developing weaker hearts due to the myocardial damage sustained. Vasopressors and inotropes have opposing effects in the body. In view of Gilmore(1999) they work through the Autonomic Nervous System to regulate the contraction of the myocardium. Both are used for resuscitation of severely ailing patients in terms of correcting hypo-tension and on cases magnified by hypoglycemia (Chelliah, 2000).
According Prewitt (2007), to vasodilators open up the blood vessels thus more blood is relayed without strain to the heart muscles. They are basically aimed at reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients. In a CS scenario, they aid in reducing inhibition of chemicals which interfere with relaxation of the heart muscles. Pulmonary thrombosis was commenced in 1970. Current developments have been observed to improve lung scans and right ventricular pressure.
Urgent transport is dependent on the distance from the patients location to the hospital. Rapid response is hampered by inability to access the patient in time. Access time of over 30 minutes compromises therapy outcome. Numerous campaigns to help individuals in early detection of signs have improved the scenario.
Administration of diuretics is in line with reduction in build up of toxins in the blood. thus the drug composition should involve diuretics which help to reduce complications in CS resulting in hypoglycemia which compromises energy levels in the myocardium.
After admission to hospital, in the case of suspected inferior sopraelevation displayed on the ECG 12 leads, one would perform a trans-oesophageal echocardiogram to determine the effusion magnitude around the myocardium. Special consideration for female pregnant patients is in line with effects confirmed by Cooper et al (2006) in relation to use of hypertensive medication. If haemodynamics do not ameliorate, I would perform emergency pericardiocentesis.
By administration of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), a natural occurring anticoagulant, my target for the clotting time would be 200 seconds possible through maintaining pump flow at 2>5l/min/m2. After stabilizing the patient, commence coronary angiography. If it displays defects on three or more vessels an emergency operation would be scheduled with the patient on a conservative dose of inotropic drugs.
On suspicion that the patient is ischaemic,I would place him on oxygen administration and glyceryl trinitrate (Ramana,R.K. Et al2008). After establishing the cause of shock and the clinical therapy required through physical observation and echo-cardiography, commence fluid resuscitation except in the instances of pulmonary edema (Byrne et al 2009). While maintaining the ABC of life,mechanical ventilation is required to maintain breathing, and stabilize the patient before catheterisation (Cook,2008).
Interference from sympathetic reactions due to pain should be stemmed using morphine sulfate which also aids the reduce oxygen debt. Enzyme inhibitors such as nitrates should be discontinued after stabilization since they may foster hypertension. Myocardial contractility can be fostered by use of inotropic agents so as to increase cardiac output without effect to the vascular resistance.
Diuretics relieve pulmonary congestion and improve oxygenation. Vasodilators should only be used after blood pressure has been stabilized otherwise they would undermine coronary flow. Thiele (2007) suggested that thrombolytic therapy has been proven efficient in situations of AMI although its effect in Cardiogenic Shock is not clear. It has not been proven to elevate survival in cases of advanced cardigenic shock.
Intra-aortic balloon pumping increases the capacity of the heart without elevating oxygen demand, unlike vasopressors. It can be used as a stand alone treatment therapy although results improve if it is combined with vascularisation. Patients displaying signs of CS who were treated in a community hospital through intra aortic balloon pump after administration of thrombolytic agents attained higher survival rates after admission. After stabilization the patient is monitored for signs of recurrence.
The key to survival after Acute Myocardial Infusion is prompt and methodical approach to uphold blood pressure and myocardial function. Before institution of angioplasty with catheterisation,cardiac revascularisation is necessary(Anderson et. al. 2003). In clinical centers without angioplasty, stimulation with intra aortic balloon pump followed by thrombolysis before transport to a more equipped center is necessary.