Foucault and Freire-Essay

At the end of “Panopticism,” Michel Foucault asks two questions. These are rhetorical questions, strategically placed at the end. Presumably we are prepared to feel their force and think of possible answers.
Is it surprising that the cellular prison, with its regular chronologies, forced labour, its authorities of surveillance and registration, its experts in normality, who continue and multiply the functions of the judge, should have become the modern instrument of penalty ? Is it surprising that prisons resemble factories, schools, barracks, hospitals, which all resemble prisons? (236).
Is Foucault making the same argument as Paulo Freire, in “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education”? Reread the Freire essay with Foucault’s general argument in mind and thinking through the particular image (and institution) of the panopticon. How might you summarize these two arguments and their take on schooling? Freire, who speaks of a revolution in education, imagines a future in which students might be “free.” Free in what sense? Does he have an answer to Foucault’s concerns? Or does Foucault have an argument that might trump Freire’s optimism.
You should assume an audience interested in education. It will not be the case, however, that they have read these two essays. You will need, then, to be careful in providing summary, paraphrase, and quotation. You will need to provide the background to an argument

Westward expansion-Essay

Order Instructions:
Order Instructions:

Describe Westward expansion,impact of Native American resettlement, expansion of railroads. How did this contribute to the economic growth and industrialization in America? Use specific examples.