THIS PAPER IS TO BE WRITTEN BY: AN ?ENGLISH ACADEMIC SUBJECT PROFESSIONAL?
For the following assignment:
Please Write A Summary Review of TPH-499 RESPONSE PAPER / A Summary Review of TPH-499 covering Lectures 12 to 24, which are presented in a word document showing all the lectures covered in this period. To support your work, please refer to TPH-499 Course Pack.pdf which will be uploaded to my account, I am not sure if it will work as this is my first time to try this, so I will try to do everything thats needed.
I will also include a copy of the assignment that I did in period 1, which was covering lectures 1 to 12, that should give you an idea of how the paper is to be written. But the paper I?m providing is my original paper which I submitted last week so treat it with care. That is an assignment that I wrote own my own but I just thought I will try the so called ?professional writer services?, my previous assignment should give you a true and accurate guide of how this paper is to be written.
Below are some additional guidelines that ought to be followed
Please use the following guide to format the structure and presentation of the work.
The Words in brackets below are to be kept as part of the work to be presented. The writer [MUST] use US English (and US English Rules of Styles)
Program: Master in Sustainable Development and Diplomacy
Student: ——|| Instructor: ———–
Course: International Academic and Professional Paper Writing
Due date: DD/MM
Note: this paper uses US English (and US English rules of style)
Please submit: 3 double spaced page paper summary responding to the material in the coursepack.
Make sure that your paper has a clear thesis and argument, as you will be evaluated on the quality of your argument and the clarity with which it is presented.}
Your ?Summery should be balanced: that is, it should cover all sections of the coursework and include a range of information and viewpoints from different authors that explore the key arguments and relevant aspects of what is covered in the coursework.
Don?t only include evidence that agrees with what you are arguing; if there are different or opposing views, then they need to be examined
You need to evaluate differing arguments – explain why one argument is more convincing than another and how they relate to the conclusion your essay arrives at.
Note: For this Summary: The recommended Style is: The Chicago Rules (Turabian)
All essays should include the following structure as guided above in brackets:
The ?introduction ?moves ?from ?general ?to ?specific. This ?is ?where you:
?open with a short orientation (introduce the topic area(s) with a general, broad opening sentence (or two);
?answer the question with a thesis statement; and provide a summary or ?road map? of your essay (keep it brief, but mention all the main ideas). ?
The body of your essay consists of paragraphs. Each is a building block in the construction of your argument.
The body is where you: ?answer the question by developing a discussion.
Show your knowledge and grasp of material you have read.
Offer exposition and evidence to develop your argument. ?use relevant examples and authoritative quotes.
If your question has more than one part, structure the body into sections that deal with each part of the question.
The conclusion moves from specific to general. It should:
Restate your answer to the question
Re-summarise the main points and;
Include a final, broad statement (about possible implications, future directions for research, to qualify the conclusion etc).
Please do not introduce new information or ideas in the conclusion – its purpose is to round off your essay by summing up.
Each paragraph in the body of the essay should deal with one main point/ aspect of your answer.
Each paragraph should contain:
1. a topic ?sentence that states the main or controlling idea;
2. supporting ?sentences to explain and develop the point you?re making;
3. evidence. Most of the time, your point should be supported by some form of evidence from your reading, or by an example drawn from the subject area.
4. analysis.Don?tjustleavetheevidence hanging there – analyse and interpret it! Comment on the implication/ significance/impact. ?
Finish off the paragraph with a critical ? conclusion you have drawn from the evidence.
PLACE AN ORDER WITH SIMILAR OR RELATED INSTRUCTIONS NOW.